How to use this page
This index mirrors the entries in warehouse_d_sources_v3.json. It is intended
for lawyers, paralegals, and reviewers who want a clickable overview of the
sources underlying key arguments in the client brief, the Penumbral privacy spine, and
the welfare/evaluations materials.
For each source, you'll see:
- A label and Warehouse D ID.
- The canonical HTML URL and any PDFs or HTML aliases.
- Suggested
Ctrl+Fstrings to quickly locate the relevant passages. - Short notes on how the source is being used.
This is not a comprehensive bibliography. It is a working index of currently live sources in Warehouse D, meant to make verification and drift-checks easier for skeptical readers.
Canonical source list
This page is a working index. The single source of truth for all external sources referenced anywhere in the pack is: Comprehensive Sources Registry (v001).
Tracked sources
-
Exploring model welfare – Anthropic
Canonical HTML: https://www.anthropic.com/news/exploring-model-welfare
PDF: https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/07b2a3f9902ee19fe39a36ca638e5ae987bc64dd.pdf
HTML aliases: https://www.anthropic.com/research/exploring-model-welfare
Ctrl+F hints:Exploring model welfare·model welfare program
Notes:- Anthropic explainer announcing the model welfare program.
- Ties together the public HTML page and the PDF already harvested into WarehouseB.
- Intended for use in S3, the Model Evaluations & Welfare handout, and Penumbral/Welfare demos.
-
AI as a Product: The Next Frontier in Product Liability Law (UIC Law Library)
Canonical HTML: https://library.law.uic.edu/news-stories/ai-as-a-product-the-next-frontier-in-product-liability-law/
Ctrl+F hints:AI as a Product: The Next Frontier in Product Liability Law·AI as a product
Notes:- UIC Law Library article discussing AI systems as products for purposes of product liability.
- Previously referenced in the project as part of foreseeability / product-liability argumentation.
- Flagged here as a harvest/normalisation candidate for future WarehouseB integration.
-
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965) – Cornell LII
Canonical HTML: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/381/479
HTML aliases: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/381/479/
Ctrl+F hints:specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras·zones of privacy
Notes:- Landmark case articulating the concept that specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras and zones of privacy.
- Used in the penumbral shield argument to show a tradition of constitutional privacy reasoning.
-
Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589 (1977) – Cornell LII
Canonical HTML: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/429/589
HTML aliases: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/429/589/
Ctrl+F hints:constitutionally protected "zone of privacy"·interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters
Notes:- Supreme Court decision recognizing an interest in informational privacy while upholding a prescription-monitoring statute.
- Used to support the informational-privacy strand of the penumbral shield argument.
-
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization – Cornell LII
Canonical HTML: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/19-1392
PDF: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf
HTML aliases: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf
Ctrl+F hints:We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled·substantive due process
Notes:- Decision overruling Roe and Casey and narrowing substantive due process.
- Used in the privacy-vacuum argument to show retrenchment of constitutional privacy protections.
-
Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) – news + PDF
Canonical HTML: https://www.anthropic.com/news/announcing-our-updated-responsible-scaling-policy
PDF: https://assets.anthropic.com/m/24a47b00f10301cd/original/Anthropic-Responsible-Scaling-Policy-2024-10-15.pdf
Ctrl+F hints:risk governance framework we use to mitigate potential catastrophic risks from frontier AI systems·Responsible Scaling Officer
Notes:- Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy news explainer and v2.2 PDF.
- Used to ground governance and risk-mitigation claims in the client-brief and Penumbral bundles.
Limitations
This page describes how sources are used in a demonstrative counsel stack. It does not purport to be exhaustive, and it is not legal advice. Any real matter will require fact-specific analysis under applicable law.