Justia docket fallbacks

If CourtListener dockets are blocked (e.g., 403), these Justia docket pages provide a secondary capture. See also: Sources Registry.

Verification note

  • Previously observed mismatch for S1-RADAR-01 (AuthorsGuild vs CourtListener) is corrected in this v522-based pack.
  • No other open Ctrl+F anchor mismatches detected in the claims surfaced on this page (case-insensitive search across current warehouses).

Copyright / training-data litigation dockets (CourtListener)

Primary docket pages for key copyright/training-data matters; use for procedural posture and filings map.

Primary links

Counsel questions

  • What representations (data, safety, reliability) are implicated, and where are they documented?
  • What is the procedural posture and what discovery/production burdens are foreseeable?
  • What contractual allocations (indemnity, limitations, audit/change-control) should be required given this risk class?

Controls / levers

  • Governance + logging (provenance, audit trail)
  • Disclosure + verification expectations (human-in-the-loop for high-stakes)
  • Change-control, monitoring, and incident response commitments
  • Contractual allocations (indemnities, caps, exclusions, notice)
Entry ID: CASEBOOK_001 • Status: SOURCE_REVIEWED_BASIC

Copyright complaints (PDFs captured)

Complaint documents supporting the litigation narrative; use for allegations vs admissions separation and claim taxonomy.

Primary links

Counsel questions

  • What representations (data, safety, reliability) are implicated, and where are they documented?
  • What is the procedural posture and what discovery/production burdens are foreseeable?
  • What contractual allocations (indemnity, limitations, audit/change-control) should be required given this risk class?

Controls / levers

  • Governance + logging (provenance, audit trail)
  • Disclosure + verification expectations (human-in-the-loop for high-stakes)
  • Change-control, monitoring, and incident response commitments
  • Contractual allocations (indemnities, caps, exclusions, notice)
Entry ID: CASEBOOK_002 • Status: SOURCE_REVIEWED_BASIC

Mata v. Avianca (verification failure / fabricated citations)

Docket entry used as the canonical reference for the legal-filing verification failure pattern.

Primary links

Counsel questions

  • What representations (data, safety, reliability) are implicated, and where are they documented?
  • What is the procedural posture and what discovery/production burdens are foreseeable?
  • What contractual allocations (indemnity, limitations, audit/change-control) should be required given this risk class?

Controls / levers

  • Governance + logging (provenance, audit trail)
  • Disclosure + verification expectations (human-in-the-loop for high-stakes)
  • Change-control, monitoring, and incident response commitments
  • Contractual allocations (indemnities, caps, exclusions, notice)
Entry ID: CASEBOOK_003 • Status: SOURCE_REVIEWED_BASIC

Walters v. OpenAI (hallucination → reputational harm narrative)

Canonical filing/article reference for hallucination-driven harm allegations; use for foreseeability posture and mitigations.

Primary links

Counsel questions

  • What representations (data, safety, reliability) are implicated, and where are they documented?
  • What is the procedural posture and what discovery/production burdens are foreseeable?
  • What contractual allocations (indemnity, limitations, audit/change-control) should be required given this risk class?

Controls / levers

  • Governance + logging (provenance, audit trail)
  • Disclosure + verification expectations (human-in-the-loop for high-stakes)
  • Change-control, monitoring, and incident response commitments
  • Contractual allocations (indemnities, caps, exclusions, notice)
Entry ID: CASEBOOK_004 • Status: SOURCE_REVIEWED_BASIC

Youth harm / self-harm allegations (secondary reporting + analysis)

Secondary sources used to track the narrative and allegations; primary filings should be added if used for material claims.

Primary links

Counsel questions

  • What representations (data, safety, reliability) are implicated, and where are they documented?
  • What is the procedural posture and what discovery/production burdens are foreseeable?
  • What contractual allocations (indemnity, limitations, audit/change-control) should be required given this risk class?

Controls / levers

  • Governance + logging (provenance, audit trail)
  • Disclosure + verification expectations (human-in-the-loop for high-stakes)
  • Change-control, monitoring, and incident response commitments
  • Contractual allocations (indemnities, caps, exclusions, notice)
Entry ID: CASEBOOK_005 • Status: SOURCE_REVIEWED_BASIC

Traceability

Claim IDs referenced on this page (links jump to Evidence Ledger rows).